George Soros On Globalization
(Paperback)
by George Soros
By "krchicago" (Chicago, IL United States)
This
review is from: George Soros on Globalization
(Hardcover)
I bought this book because I wanted to learn something about
the globalization debate and try to understand why it has
gotten some people stirred up enought to riot in Seattle and
stage mass protests elsewhere. I had at least heard of the
World Bank, the IMF and the WTO before all this got started,
but (like probably 98% of Americans) I had no real idea of what
they do or how they do it. I didn't want to start out by
reading either an economist (since as a general rule they seem
to be excruciatingly poor writers) or one of the radical
reformers (ditto). George Soros seemed like the perfect
solution -- a successful player in the international financial
markets, who has directed a significant chunk of his wealth to
international philanthropic efforts. In other words, someone
who has seen the problems from the inside and is working to
remedy them (even though he has a stake in the current system).
Soros' conviction in France last week for insider trading
probably hurts his personal credibility, but doesn't affect the
validity of his arguments about our international institutions
and the US's role in the world.
"George Soros on Globalization" is a
short book (about 180 pages, with *lots* of blank space), which
is both its chief virtue and a significant limitation. It's a
fast read and gave me a good overview of the problems with our
global financial and trade arrangements (what these markets can
and cannot do, the role the US has played and should play in
the allocation of private and public goods), and a basic
understanding of some possible solutions. Brevity also
translates to very little explanation, however (I still don't
really know what the World Bank and the IMF do), and very
little development of Soros' thoughts on possible solutions.
For example, Soros suggests that strengthening the ILO (rather
than weakening the WTO) is the way to address global labor
issues, but it's hard to imagine this happening and before I
would consider this a practical solution I'd want to know more
about how this would work and whether it's really feasible.
The "centerpiece" of Soros' book is his proposal for a
reformed method of providing foreign aid through Special
Drawing Rights (SDRs). Unfortunately, if you don't know
anything about currency reserves and how they affect the
economies of developing countries (and I don't), a lot of this
discussion will be over your head. I had to take on faith quite
a few bald statements about how SDRs would work and how they
will benefit developing nations. And I had some questions about
the parts that were easier to follow. For example, Soros
proposes an independent board of professionally qualified
experts who will identify projects that are eligible for donor
financing. He emphasizes the importance of this board being
professional, expert and free of national ties -- but he makes
no suggestion as to how this laudable but probably unrealistic
goal is to be achieved.
Soros' concluding chapter is essentially a plea for the US
to develop a broader understanding of its global interests --
that we are strongest and safest when we promote a more
equitable distribution of public goods (such as health,
education and the rule of law) and take a more multi-lateral
leadership role in the reduction of poverty worldwide. I happen
to agree with Soros here, but I doubt that this chapter will
persuade anyone who is not already inclined to accept Soros'
conclusions.
Despite the defects noted, I would recommend this book to
anyone who is wondering what the fuss over globalization is all
about. If you read nothing else, this will at least give you an
overview of the issues. Soros' writing style tends to the
oracular pronouncement (there are lots of one or two sentence
paragraphs -- as if the book grew out of a series of bullet
points that he couldn't be troubled to turn into real
paragraphs), which can be annoying, but it does get you through
the material quickly. Overall, a stimulating read.
|